A spring release for The Lords of Midnight and Doomdark’s Revenge. Version 2.0.8 has hit the stores. There are a number of LoM changes but it’s a huge DDR update. Check out the last post for full details of all the changes. Last thing for me to do with this update is to get it back one GoG.
Unless there are any problems then this will be the last Cocos2d-x release. Don’t worry – there is a replacement plan…
As you will be aware if you’ve paid attention to my many troubles with development over the years, I moved from Marmalade SDK to Cocos2d-x a few years ago due to Marmalade getting out of the SDK game. It’s been two years since I managed the v2 release which was the first under Cocos2d-, and. it was six years ago that I managed my last Marmalade build.
Well Cocos2d-x is pretty much no longer supported. After they released v4 they have not done any updates in 3 years. As we all know, mobile platforms move forward very quickly, and there is always the chance that either Google or Apple will change something enough that the games don’t work anymore, and then even though it’s open source you’ll need to be luck enough that someone fixes the problem for you, or you are deep in to it yourself. However, changes are usually just small fixes, if Apple decide something fundamentally needs to change in the system, low level c++ SDKs are going to need a lot of work. There are already bugs in the Metal implementation that have dogged my port since I released it that have never been addressed.
Luckily, there is a new supported fork of Cocos2d-x called Axmol. They’ve pushed the SDK forward and fixed a huge amount of issues that existed in Cocos2d-x. I’ve been eyeing it for a while but I finally took the plunge earlier this year and have ported to it. It was a relatively smooth transition as far as most of the engine was concerned. Because it’s based on Cocos2d-x it was mainly about getting the project setup file correctly formatted and not much about the code. However there were a number of issues with the OSX port, which is the one I started with, that were probably unique to me. I say that because I suspect at this stage not many people have released Mac games fully through the App Store with Axmol, or indeed Cocos2d-x to be fairl. But the team were fantastic and we got them all ironed out relatively quickly.
I just have some tweaking on the Windows version which is more to do with building with multiple assets, (my projects are setup to be both LoM and DDR which is not quite the expected process for Axmol). But I expect to be fully operational across all platforms very soon.
I’d like to get test versions out soon, and will likely start that process in the next month.
With the move to Axmol I believe that the games will be safe on the current platforms for at least a few more years yet. I actually think it’s remarkable that it’s been 11 years since I originally released LoM on iOS.
I realise that the last official release was actually Spring Equinox 2023 – nearly a year ago!
It’s not that I’ve not been busy. There has been plenty of development, some sideline things, but ultimately I’ve not been visiting the land of Midnight quite as much as I would have liked. I can insert all the usual excuses here, but ultimately it just comes back to enthusiasm and time management.
So I’ve just pushed the button on the next release. It’s heading to testers now and will be available to all soon. if you just can’t wait you can sign up for testing of iOS LOM and DDR or register for Open Testing for Android LOM or DDR (click link from your device). OSX and Windows versions are available from the download pages – LOM and DDR
The observant among you will notice that there are actually two releases. This is because if had a release ready to go last year, but just never pushed the button on it. That is, except for Android. I had to push a mandatory Android release for targeting SDK 33 – so I pushed it out around October and didn’t even mention it. So there is a good chance that if you’re an Android user you already have 2.0.7
This is really a DDR heavy release, and I must also add a shout out to Andrew Smart for keeping on my toes with all his questions while he has been beavering on with his implementation of Doomdark’s Revenge. There are a few issues the the below list that came out of those questions. Particularly the bug fixes…
v2.0.8 (47)
ADDED: Game Difficulty – Number of followers should affect outcome of fights
UPDATED: Lords should not be displaced when a member of a group
UPDATED: Groups should not disbanded when the leader dies in a battle
ADDED: Game Difficulty – Number of Soldiers affects the outcome of a fight
ADDED: DDR – Game Option – Upgrade to Shareth Army AI
FIXED: DDR – Character without an army doesn’t trigger an AI lord deciding to stay at a location
FIXED: DDR – ‘prepares to do battle’ message is shown incorrectly
FIXED: DDR – Imgorarg’s loyalty is incorrect – should be Dwarf
FIXED: DDR – Dawn energy boosts are flipped for AI / Non AI characters
FIXED: DDR – Dawn energy boosts for resting are fixed and not based on hours remaining
FIXED: DDR – Recruitment does not take in to account the power of the 5 main special objects
FIXED: DDR – Incorrect object name / types
v2.0.7 (46)
ADDED: Game Difficulty – time affects seeking
ADDED: Game Difficulty – time affects hiding
ADDED: Game Difficulty – time affects recruiting
FIXED: DDR – Think page incorrectly shows Person and Army info outside of tunnels
ADDED: DDR – Game Option – Don’t swap after successful approach
ADDED: LOM – Game Option – Auto Seek enhancement
ADDED: LOM – Game Option – Auto Approach enhancement
UPDATED: Android target sdk 33
So let’s talk about what all the above features mean…
Firstly a note on Difficulty. When it is set to NORMAL which is the default, then the game plays as original. Changes only apply to EASY, MEDIUM, and HARD.
If a lord goes in to a fight, the chances of death or losing a horse will be removed by fighting as a group. The current rules for LoM of a friendly army being at the location still apply. So really this only applies when all the lords do not have an army. In DDR the lords’s armies could still lose numbers, but the lord will not engage the nasty. The number of followers that has an affect is based on difficulty.
When a lord loses a battle and does not die and are part of a group, then the lord should not be displaced so that they can stay in the group. They should however not take part in any more of the battle. In hard mode, then they could still be displaced. What this essentially means is that in hard mode you may have to remove the lord from the group yourself, which is a conscious decision as you might not be aware that they are no longer with the group.
If a lord goes in to a fight, the chances of death or losing a horse will be removed by fighting with soldiers. In DDR the lords’s armies could still lose numbers, but the lord will not engage the nasty. The number of soldiers that has an affect is based on difficulty.
Two changes for this feature. Firstly, AI Lords have the habit of leaving a fight. This option makes them act like LoM and stay until their death or other lords leave. They may also choose to leave if the total number of soldiers is not currently within their favour. Secondly, AI lords have the habit of not attacking enemies that are close by, unlike LoM. This feature makes them act more like LoM.
These decisions are linked to game difficulty and lord traits.
This is a bug fix. AI Lords make a decision to leave a location at the start of their turn. If there is an enemy at the location it’s pretty much a toss of a coin. But lords with no armies don’t get included in the enemy count, and therefore an AI lord will not consider lone lords when they are making the decision on whether to stay at a location.
The addition of the words, “prepares to do battle” was inconsistently shown. It was possible for a lord to still be in battle in the morning and the message would not be correct.
Resting characters energy is hard coded to a fixed amount and should have been calculated based on the number of hours remaining when they started to rest.
The Crown of Varenand, Crown of Carudrium, Spell of Thigrorn, Runes of Finorn, and Crown of Imiriel should all have a positive affect on recruitment. But they didn’t.
Recruitment time for both lords has a group of new rules depending on game difficulty. In easy the recruiter loses no time and the recruited is reset to dawn. In medium the recruiter loses one hour and the recruited time is set to the same. In hard they are both set to night.
Added an option to stop the auto switch to the newly recruited lord after an approach. Player can choose to DO NOTHING or stick. After the approach a new icon is displayed next to the Look icon to indicate either the recruited or the recruiter lord depending on the swap option.
Added an option to auto approach when entering a location in LoM. This was not added as a feature for DDR because approaching is done from outside the location and is also linked to battle.
Not sure when the next release will be. I had one scheduled in for Spring Equinox which I guess this one is kind of becoming. Therefore the next release would be Summer Solstice (June 21st) but I’m not promising anything as I potentially have to perform another SDK switch!
Looking for some opinions on Doomdark’s Revenge battles.
In Lords of Midnight a Lord cannot be killed until they have no army. This is obviously a one way thing as there are no enemy lords.
In Doomdark’s Revenge the overall night processing cycles through all lords from 1 to 128 giving them each chance to fight at their location if they have not been involved in a battle yet.
It then cycles through the lords at that location given them the chance to become the attacker.
FOR ALL LORDS IN LOCATION – (attacker) choose defender = random lord at location 1. attacker vs defender lord attack 2. attacker army vs defender army 3. defender army vs attacker army NEXT choose defender = random lord at location 4. stronghold vs defender 5. stronghold vs lord defender
If there are only two lords in a location then they will both have a pop at each other. If there is a stronghold then it will take a pop at just one of them ( if both are enemies of the stronghold ), or just the one enemy.
If there are multiple lords in a location, then random selection means that some of the lords might get hit multiple times, and some not at all.
During the battle, If an army is reduced to 0 then there is a chance that he relevant lord will flee or die.
However in lord vs lord the the attackers success is calculated from a formula that includes carrying a battle object, energy, despondency, and recklessness. Gives a number between 0 and 255
The defending lords’s chance is a random number between 0 and 255
if attacker’s chance is greater than defender’s chance then the attacker wins.
When defender loses, then chance of dying is 1 – 50:50 survive 2 – is recklessness less than a random number between 0 and 255 3 – If carrying a battle object then 30% chance
The upshot of all that is – it’s pretty easy for a lord to die in a battle against another lord regardless of size of their individual armies. And it has nothing to do really with strength or even attacker initiative.
I’m trying to add a game play rule option for better battle AI and wonder of ways to make the lord vs lord a little fairer!
I’m thinking of adding runes of protection in at step 3 I’m also thinking of doing some maths on the lords army – ie: rather than just if army greater than zero they can’t die, maybe have a low army threshold eg. Less than 100 soldiers, or a percentage compared to the attacker’s…
